It's no secret that I have no love for the man we currently call our President.
Mr. Obama is truly a disgrace to our history as the greatest nation in the world. I heard about this story while in Houston working with clients this week. The story is actually a little old, but the truth of it is still just the perfect example of why I cannot stand this man.
This man's son was killed in action defending our freedoms. President Obama simple sent a autotyped, autosigned impersonal letter to his parents....oh yea, about 4 months later.
This man is gutless and selfish. At least President Bush made every sacrifice a personal thing.
What a sorry excuse of a leader. If you can read this and not be appalled then you are likely just like him. Here you go.Click here to read.
http://columbiadailyherald.com/sections/opinion/letters-editor/poorly-timed-letter-shows-obama%E2%80%99s-disregard-vets.htmlc
Brady Speers
Showing posts with label Liberalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberalism. Show all posts
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Friday, July 19, 2013
This is Setting Up Perfectly for the Next President
My 2016 prediction.
I stated after our 2012 defeat that I wasn't sure conservatives would likely ever win the White House again any time soon. As Rush says, it's hard to beat Santa Clause.
But this is setting up even better than expected for the liberals and here is my predicted outcome 3 years ahead.
Obama will keep interest rates down by continuing to print money as he has for years now. Nothing will get much better nor will it get much worse, and just as he has now for 6 years, he will simply blame Bush.
As soon as he is out of office the next President will be handed the mess of having to slow down the printing, which will result in interest rates going up and inflation kicking in. We will have to go through a few years of financial mess in order to come out on the other side.
Who will get the blame? The conservative winner who magically won't be able to get away with blaming it on Obama before him.
If a liberal wins in 2016, they will simply just keep printing money, keep blaming Bush and send us into debt hell.
You heard it hear first.
What a perfect game plan.
I stated after our 2012 defeat that I wasn't sure conservatives would likely ever win the White House again any time soon. As Rush says, it's hard to beat Santa Clause.
But this is setting up even better than expected for the liberals and here is my predicted outcome 3 years ahead.
Obama will keep interest rates down by continuing to print money as he has for years now. Nothing will get much better nor will it get much worse, and just as he has now for 6 years, he will simply blame Bush.
As soon as he is out of office the next President will be handed the mess of having to slow down the printing, which will result in interest rates going up and inflation kicking in. We will have to go through a few years of financial mess in order to come out on the other side.
Who will get the blame? The conservative winner who magically won't be able to get away with blaming it on Obama before him.
If a liberal wins in 2016, they will simply just keep printing money, keep blaming Bush and send us into debt hell.
You heard it hear first.
What a perfect game plan.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Obama's Growing "Legacy"
Had no idea it would be THIS bad back in 2007 when I started talking about what a disaster this man would be for America. This is my ongoing list of the scandals and mess he has allowed under his watch.
1. Fast N Furious
2. Obamacare debacle
3. IRS targeting of Conservatives
4. NSA spying on Americans
5. Bengahzi
6. ACORN scandal
7. Wire-tapping of the AP
1. Fast N Furious
2. Obamacare debacle
3. IRS targeting of Conservatives
4. NSA spying on Americans
5. Bengahzi
6. ACORN scandal
7. Wire-tapping of the AP
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Brady Speers,
Liberalism,
Obama,
Republican
Saturday, November 10, 2012
One Final WrapUp - Change is Needed in the GOP
After this week’s shocking election results, most of us conservatives entered a state of full blown political depression and numbness. Some have been asking me what I think happened. I too have spent the last few days trying to figure out. This is my final wrap if you will.
Let’s face it. Romney didn’t just lose. He got his arse kicked. 332-206. Ouch. It was 2008 all over again. Actually, McCain got more conservative votes than Romney did which I still find so unreal.
As I stated in my last post, I am done with political activism for a long time. I’m sure I’ll pop up in 2016 but for now, let Obama and his peeps have what they want. I’m too tired to care. The only hope we really have now is to overturn many Senate seats in 2014 to shorten the damage. But, if we nominate over-the-top right winged candidates that make stupid comments like Akins and Mourdock did this go around, that won’t end well either.
But I did want to offer my thoughts on what happened, why and what needs to happen if conservatives ever want to win the White House again. I will keep it simple and to the point.
1. The GOP enthusiasm wasn’t as expected. Though Obama had 10 million less votes than in 2008, more than 3,000,000 conservatives didn’t vote for Romney. More than likely a lot of these were Ron Paul supporters and Tea Partiers. Others were just GOPers who didn’t buy into the Romney campaign. Well, thanks guys but now we all get Obama for 4 more years. Good job.
2. Our culture is no longer a majority “center-right” country. There are more getting handouts than don’t. As Rush Limbaugh said we are fighting against “Santa”. Most of these people are also extremely uneducated politically, yet they vote. In its current form, the GOP offers nothing attractive to most of them.
3. Romney wussed out after the 1st debate and let Obama get away with taking all of the momentum from him. He had the chance to hammer Obama on numerous issues but tried to be nice and instead came across as a distant rich guy. His game plan failed. People liked the aggressive in-your-face Obama more.
4. After election polls and focus groups make it clear that the GOP better change or we may never win the Presidential election again.
Number 4 above is the most important. There are some glaring issues that we must be honest in hearing and accepting. If we don’t address them and change our methods, we will never see another conservative President. We have to change in the following ways.
- Immediately, the GOP needs to work with the Democrats and give Obama and his team what they want with some things in exchange of course. If they remain hard lined and unwilling, it will mean the end of us in 2014 and again in 2016. Give them what they want, let them fall on their own sword and they will then own 100% of their own failures. Nominate the right candidate in 2016 and it will be over.
- Voters viewed Romney as a nice but distant, old rich, white guy. Same as McCain, Bush and Bush before him. This is the “establishment” candidate at its finest. This establishment refuses to think we live in a different day. Well, we do. People today are not like people 10 years ago much less 40 years ago. Politics are different. If we keep nominating rich, old, white dudes, we are going to keep losing. We can't be arrogant and assume people will come back around. Our culture has changed and if we don't change to work within that culture we are toast. And, we can do this without becoming like them either. I hear people making that argument and it's just dumb.
- We need a candidate that is younger, not rich, more relational and more like the common voter. The voters like a younger, more relational, “cool” candidate. We had some of these in the conservative world this go around, but instead we ended up with the 2008 runner-up.
- Ron Paul and Tea Party followers better find a way to come together instead of dividing us or it will get even worse.
- Right-winged, vocal Christian candidates with their faith and beliefs on their sleeves are a big problem. The non-believing voter doesn’t want to hear it and certainly not if they open their mouths about it every single day. We have to be smart. Wise as serpents and gentles as doves. Candidates need to keep it under wrap, until AFTER they win! Duh!
- We need to change our language and words. The Democrats never call themselves “liberals” anymore. They are now “progressives”. Capitalism is a bad word nowadays. Reword some of our concepts.
- Our negativity and condescending attitudes towards the liberals on social media and the like are killing us. I’m the biggest sinner in this regard. We have to be about convincing and educating people about conservative values and how THEY can benefit from them if they would just listen. But who is going to listen when we just called them idiots, morons or libtards and attacked their President every hour of the day?
- Consider ideas like “we aren’t the anti-gay party who has to push a marriage act”. Consider saying “we aren’t going to endorse it either way” our focus is conservative government issues, not how you live your lives. Be the party that seeks to give the powers back to the States for these types of social issues, etc. We don’t have to compromise all of our principles, but we need to modernize how we explain and promote them to a degree, unless we just never want to be in power again.
All we need are about 2% more of the votes and we win every time. Conservative values still have a big place. The reality is who doesn’t want these things:
- Less government intrusion in your life
- Lower taxes
- More jobs
- Strong military
- Protection of the Constitution
- Lower gas prices
- Protection of life
- Religious freedom
- Fewer regulations
But when people feel like they would have to join the angry, mean, rich, anti-gay, better-be-a-Christian party, they turn back to the other side. Plain and simple.
We have potential in people like Santorum, Ryan, Rubio, Christie, West, and others. We must nominate and all get behind a young, relational, cool, true conservative candidate regardless if they are Jesus reincarnated. If we don’t, our conservative days will be left to wining local and state races only.
Time will tell if I am right or wrong, but I believe I am very right. We will see.
See you in a few years…if I see promise with the above occurring.
Let’s face it. Romney didn’t just lose. He got his arse kicked. 332-206. Ouch. It was 2008 all over again. Actually, McCain got more conservative votes than Romney did which I still find so unreal.
As I stated in my last post, I am done with political activism for a long time. I’m sure I’ll pop up in 2016 but for now, let Obama and his peeps have what they want. I’m too tired to care. The only hope we really have now is to overturn many Senate seats in 2014 to shorten the damage. But, if we nominate over-the-top right winged candidates that make stupid comments like Akins and Mourdock did this go around, that won’t end well either.
But I did want to offer my thoughts on what happened, why and what needs to happen if conservatives ever want to win the White House again. I will keep it simple and to the point.
1. The GOP enthusiasm wasn’t as expected. Though Obama had 10 million less votes than in 2008, more than 3,000,000 conservatives didn’t vote for Romney. More than likely a lot of these were Ron Paul supporters and Tea Partiers. Others were just GOPers who didn’t buy into the Romney campaign. Well, thanks guys but now we all get Obama for 4 more years. Good job.
2. Our culture is no longer a majority “center-right” country. There are more getting handouts than don’t. As Rush Limbaugh said we are fighting against “Santa”. Most of these people are also extremely uneducated politically, yet they vote. In its current form, the GOP offers nothing attractive to most of them.
3. Romney wussed out after the 1st debate and let Obama get away with taking all of the momentum from him. He had the chance to hammer Obama on numerous issues but tried to be nice and instead came across as a distant rich guy. His game plan failed. People liked the aggressive in-your-face Obama more.
4. After election polls and focus groups make it clear that the GOP better change or we may never win the Presidential election again.
Number 4 above is the most important. There are some glaring issues that we must be honest in hearing and accepting. If we don’t address them and change our methods, we will never see another conservative President. We have to change in the following ways.
- Immediately, the GOP needs to work with the Democrats and give Obama and his team what they want with some things in exchange of course. If they remain hard lined and unwilling, it will mean the end of us in 2014 and again in 2016. Give them what they want, let them fall on their own sword and they will then own 100% of their own failures. Nominate the right candidate in 2016 and it will be over.
- Voters viewed Romney as a nice but distant, old rich, white guy. Same as McCain, Bush and Bush before him. This is the “establishment” candidate at its finest. This establishment refuses to think we live in a different day. Well, we do. People today are not like people 10 years ago much less 40 years ago. Politics are different. If we keep nominating rich, old, white dudes, we are going to keep losing. We can't be arrogant and assume people will come back around. Our culture has changed and if we don't change to work within that culture we are toast. And, we can do this without becoming like them either. I hear people making that argument and it's just dumb.
- We need a candidate that is younger, not rich, more relational and more like the common voter. The voters like a younger, more relational, “cool” candidate. We had some of these in the conservative world this go around, but instead we ended up with the 2008 runner-up.
- Ron Paul and Tea Party followers better find a way to come together instead of dividing us or it will get even worse.
- Right-winged, vocal Christian candidates with their faith and beliefs on their sleeves are a big problem. The non-believing voter doesn’t want to hear it and certainly not if they open their mouths about it every single day. We have to be smart. Wise as serpents and gentles as doves. Candidates need to keep it under wrap, until AFTER they win! Duh!
- We need to change our language and words. The Democrats never call themselves “liberals” anymore. They are now “progressives”. Capitalism is a bad word nowadays. Reword some of our concepts.
- Our negativity and condescending attitudes towards the liberals on social media and the like are killing us. I’m the biggest sinner in this regard. We have to be about convincing and educating people about conservative values and how THEY can benefit from them if they would just listen. But who is going to listen when we just called them idiots, morons or libtards and attacked their President every hour of the day?
- Consider ideas like “we aren’t the anti-gay party who has to push a marriage act”. Consider saying “we aren’t going to endorse it either way” our focus is conservative government issues, not how you live your lives. Be the party that seeks to give the powers back to the States for these types of social issues, etc. We don’t have to compromise all of our principles, but we need to modernize how we explain and promote them to a degree, unless we just never want to be in power again.
All we need are about 2% more of the votes and we win every time. Conservative values still have a big place. The reality is who doesn’t want these things:
- Less government intrusion in your life
- Lower taxes
- More jobs
- Strong military
- Protection of the Constitution
- Lower gas prices
- Protection of life
- Religious freedom
- Fewer regulations
But when people feel like they would have to join the angry, mean, rich, anti-gay, better-be-a-Christian party, they turn back to the other side. Plain and simple.
We have potential in people like Santorum, Ryan, Rubio, Christie, West, and others. We must nominate and all get behind a young, relational, cool, true conservative candidate regardless if they are Jesus reincarnated. If we don’t, our conservative days will be left to wining local and state races only.
Time will tell if I am right or wrong, but I believe I am very right. We will see.
See you in a few years…if I see promise with the above occurring.
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
America Speaks - Obama Stopped In His Tracks
Hyper-liberalism has run its course and the American people have put it where it belongs. On the path to nowhere.
Millions of voters made it clear in historic proportions in every state. We want less spending, more jobs in the private sector, less taxes, Obamacare repealed, better national security and smaller government.
By winning the House, nearly all Governor races and a de facto win in the Senate with more seats, Obama will now have to decide.
Will Obama remain an idealist or will he be more pragmatic like Clinton did in 1994 and reinvent himself? Either way, conservatism wins.
It was a good, good night for our amazing country. The stage is set for 2012.
Peace out.
Millions of voters made it clear in historic proportions in every state. We want less spending, more jobs in the private sector, less taxes, Obamacare repealed, better national security and smaller government.
By winning the House, nearly all Governor races and a de facto win in the Senate with more seats, Obama will now have to decide.
Will Obama remain an idealist or will he be more pragmatic like Clinton did in 1994 and reinvent himself? Either way, conservatism wins.
It was a good, good night for our amazing country. The stage is set for 2012.
Peace out.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Brady Speers,
GOP,
J. Brady Speers,
Liberalism,
Obama,
Republican
Saturday, July 19, 2008
Obama's Flip List is Getting Huge
For someone who promotes "change", he sure does enough of it!
Check out this Obama Flip-Flop list provided by the Boston Globe and you tell me if this is the man that should lead our nation. Seems to me he is just trying to do what all politicians do - get votes, which means he is really no different than all of those before him.
Obama's Top Ten Flip Flops
1. SPECIAL INTERESTS. In January, the Obama campaign described union contributions to the campaigns of Clinton and John Edwards as "special interest" money. Obama changed his tune as he began gathering his own union endorsements. He now refers respectfully to unions as the representatives of "working people" and says he is "thrilled" by their support.
2. THE CUBA EMBARGO. In January 2004, Obama said it was time "to end the embargo with Cuba" because it had "utterly failed in the effort to overthrow Castro." Speaking to a Cuban American audience in Miami in August 2007, he said he would not "take off the embargo" as president because it is "an important inducement for change."
3. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. In a March 2004 questionnaire, Obama was asked if the government should "crack down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants." He replied "Oppose." In a Jan. 31, 2008, televised debate, he said that "we do have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation."
4. DECRIMINALIZATION OF MARAJUANA. While running for the U.S. Senate in January 2004, Obama told Illinois college students that he supported eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana use. In the Oct. 30, 2007, presidential debate, he joined other Democratic candidates in opposing the decriminalization of marijuana.
5. NAFTA. During the primary season, Obama hammered Hillary Clinton for her support of NAFTA as First Lady, calling the free trade agreement "devastating" and "a big mistake." Now, in an interview with Fortune to be featured in the magazine's upcoming issue, the presumptive Democratic nominee said that NAFTA has indeed been positive for the US in some ways, and that his earlier criticism - while trying to convince white blue collar voters in some states to vote for him - was 'overheated and amplified.'
6. THE DEATH PENALTY. Ten years ago, when Obama was running for statewide office in an ultra-liberal Chicago district, he opposed the death penalty. As Obama announced this week, he now supports the ultimate penalty.
7. HANDGUN BAN. For 8 years--before becoming a US Senator--Obama sat on the board of a non-profit which contributed $2.7 million to efforts advocating for a complete ban on handguns. (Before that, Obama filled out a questionnaire in 1996 stating that he supported a ban on the manufacture, sale AND POSSESSION of handguns.) But starting with his primary campaign in the gun popular Midwest, Obama now opposes such legislation, and claims to support gun owner's rights.
8. PROPOSED FISA LAW IMMUNITY FOR TELECOMS. In October, 2007, Obama pledged that if the FISA bill contained an immunity provision for telecoms, he would not only oppose the bill, he would help block it through a filibuster. This week, he voted for the bill, telecom immunity provisions and all.
9. PUBLIC FINANCING FOR OBAMA'S GENERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN. In November, 2007, Obama issued a written pledge to opt into the public campaign finance system for the general presidential election, if the Republican nominee also did so. John McCain immediately accepted the pledge, which acceptance Obama acknowledged in writing in November 2007. After he became the Republican nominee, McCain opted into the public finance system (as he pledged to do), but Obama broke his pledge and opted out.
10. THE WAR IN IRAQ. In 2004--when Obama was running for the United States Senate-- Barack Obama not only said that he was open to a U.S. troop increase in Iraq, but warned against a premature troop withdrawal as a "slap in the face to the troops fighting there" which could make Iraq "an extraordinary hotbed of terrorist activity." Fast forward to Obama's presidential campaign premised in large part on an immediate withdrawal from Iraq.
These 10 examples evince 180 degree changes by the Senator from Chicago on fundamental issues going to the core of Obama as a candidate, and provide important indications of whether the "change" candidate will do what he promises to do in the campaign to court our votes.
Legitimate questions are also raised as to whether Obama is accurately portraying himself during the election process, or is he simply feinting to the middle like the good basketball player he is? How many more Obama flip-flops can we expect before November 2008, and to what extent can the "change" candidate continue to portray himself a different kind of politician who rejects "politics as usual"?
Also another note. While he has flip flopped on many issues Barack Obama has had to backtrack on foreign policy issues, just recently on Jerusalem. He tried to outdo John McCain at AIPAC by insisting that Jerusalem remain the undivided capital of Israel. The Palestinians erupted in anger at that statement, and by the end of the day they had Obama backpedaling...not sure if its a flip flop.
Check out this Obama Flip-Flop list provided by the Boston Globe and you tell me if this is the man that should lead our nation. Seems to me he is just trying to do what all politicians do - get votes, which means he is really no different than all of those before him.
Obama's Top Ten Flip Flops
1. SPECIAL INTERESTS. In January, the Obama campaign described union contributions to the campaigns of Clinton and John Edwards as "special interest" money. Obama changed his tune as he began gathering his own union endorsements. He now refers respectfully to unions as the representatives of "working people" and says he is "thrilled" by their support.
2. THE CUBA EMBARGO. In January 2004, Obama said it was time "to end the embargo with Cuba" because it had "utterly failed in the effort to overthrow Castro." Speaking to a Cuban American audience in Miami in August 2007, he said he would not "take off the embargo" as president because it is "an important inducement for change."
3. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. In a March 2004 questionnaire, Obama was asked if the government should "crack down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants." He replied "Oppose." In a Jan. 31, 2008, televised debate, he said that "we do have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation."
4. DECRIMINALIZATION OF MARAJUANA. While running for the U.S. Senate in January 2004, Obama told Illinois college students that he supported eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana use. In the Oct. 30, 2007, presidential debate, he joined other Democratic candidates in opposing the decriminalization of marijuana.
5. NAFTA. During the primary season, Obama hammered Hillary Clinton for her support of NAFTA as First Lady, calling the free trade agreement "devastating" and "a big mistake." Now, in an interview with Fortune to be featured in the magazine's upcoming issue, the presumptive Democratic nominee said that NAFTA has indeed been positive for the US in some ways, and that his earlier criticism - while trying to convince white blue collar voters in some states to vote for him - was 'overheated and amplified.'
6. THE DEATH PENALTY. Ten years ago, when Obama was running for statewide office in an ultra-liberal Chicago district, he opposed the death penalty. As Obama announced this week, he now supports the ultimate penalty.
7. HANDGUN BAN. For 8 years--before becoming a US Senator--Obama sat on the board of a non-profit which contributed $2.7 million to efforts advocating for a complete ban on handguns. (Before that, Obama filled out a questionnaire in 1996 stating that he supported a ban on the manufacture, sale AND POSSESSION of handguns.) But starting with his primary campaign in the gun popular Midwest, Obama now opposes such legislation, and claims to support gun owner's rights.
8. PROPOSED FISA LAW IMMUNITY FOR TELECOMS. In October, 2007, Obama pledged that if the FISA bill contained an immunity provision for telecoms, he would not only oppose the bill, he would help block it through a filibuster. This week, he voted for the bill, telecom immunity provisions and all.
9. PUBLIC FINANCING FOR OBAMA'S GENERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN. In November, 2007, Obama issued a written pledge to opt into the public campaign finance system for the general presidential election, if the Republican nominee also did so. John McCain immediately accepted the pledge, which acceptance Obama acknowledged in writing in November 2007. After he became the Republican nominee, McCain opted into the public finance system (as he pledged to do), but Obama broke his pledge and opted out.
10. THE WAR IN IRAQ. In 2004--when Obama was running for the United States Senate-- Barack Obama not only said that he was open to a U.S. troop increase in Iraq, but warned against a premature troop withdrawal as a "slap in the face to the troops fighting there" which could make Iraq "an extraordinary hotbed of terrorist activity." Fast forward to Obama's presidential campaign premised in large part on an immediate withdrawal from Iraq.
These 10 examples evince 180 degree changes by the Senator from Chicago on fundamental issues going to the core of Obama as a candidate, and provide important indications of whether the "change" candidate will do what he promises to do in the campaign to court our votes.
Legitimate questions are also raised as to whether Obama is accurately portraying himself during the election process, or is he simply feinting to the middle like the good basketball player he is? How many more Obama flip-flops can we expect before November 2008, and to what extent can the "change" candidate continue to portray himself a different kind of politician who rejects "politics as usual"?
Also another note. While he has flip flopped on many issues Barack Obama has had to backtrack on foreign policy issues, just recently on Jerusalem. He tried to outdo John McCain at AIPAC by insisting that Jerusalem remain the undivided capital of Israel. The Palestinians erupted in anger at that statement, and by the end of the day they had Obama backpedaling...not sure if its a flip flop.
Friday, February 22, 2008
Oh Momma, Please Not Obama
We seriously need to be praying about this election. I spent 2 hours last night reading about this guy and listening to the debate he had with Hillary. This guy is smooth and people are following him like the dumb sheep the Bible says humans can be like.
This is a very serious deal for us as a nation. Read his plans for healthcare which will destroy businesses like mine and ruin the best healthcare system in the world. Then read his incredible statements about his views on faith. He uses flowery speach to promote his ideas and get people to follow him blindly just like Hitler did. This is VERY scary for us as Americans.
Remember, whatever his plans are if he is elected WILL be approved because the Dems control the HOUSE and the SENATE right now.
We have to be very involved in this election to ensure they do not win! The moral landscape of the nation is at hand, with a man who claims he can solve about 100 issues. How are people so dumb to believe a guy who has done NOTHING!!! (more on that coming soon)
He says we need to get away from being specific about what we believe when we speak in public since in our world today we have a "pluralistic society". This is from his website: Senator Obama also laid down principles for how to discuss faith in a pluralistic society, including the need for religious people to translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values during public debate.
This is right from the PDF listed on his own website and it is even worse...
"Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of non-believers." - Barack Obama
Scary stuff my friends. He spins it so that people respond with support rooted in ignorance. People are falling for this junk like flies too. He sounds like a copy-kat version of Martin Luther King Jr.
I believe most are supporting him because of two reasons - he is black and he gives rousing speaches. Surely we are not that stupid...
I cannot believe the supposed Christian leaders that appear to be endorsing this guy. He calls these three specifically good friends. Rick Warren (I think he is getting influcened by new age thinking any way), TD Jakes (no shocker there as he does not even preach the true Word) and author Tony Campolo (this one was a shocker).
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/faith/ (read the PDF)
I guess it is time we get onn the McCain train and hope he brings along Huckabee or someone with some real values. We have a BIG fight ahead of us. This Obama guy is even beating the Clinton Express and a year ago no one thought that was possible!
This is a very serious deal for us as a nation. Read his plans for healthcare which will destroy businesses like mine and ruin the best healthcare system in the world. Then read his incredible statements about his views on faith. He uses flowery speach to promote his ideas and get people to follow him blindly just like Hitler did. This is VERY scary for us as Americans.
Remember, whatever his plans are if he is elected WILL be approved because the Dems control the HOUSE and the SENATE right now.
We have to be very involved in this election to ensure they do not win! The moral landscape of the nation is at hand, with a man who claims he can solve about 100 issues. How are people so dumb to believe a guy who has done NOTHING!!! (more on that coming soon)
He says we need to get away from being specific about what we believe when we speak in public since in our world today we have a "pluralistic society". This is from his website: Senator Obama also laid down principles for how to discuss faith in a pluralistic society, including the need for religious people to translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values during public debate.
This is right from the PDF listed on his own website and it is even worse...
"Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of non-believers." - Barack Obama
Scary stuff my friends. He spins it so that people respond with support rooted in ignorance. People are falling for this junk like flies too. He sounds like a copy-kat version of Martin Luther King Jr.
I believe most are supporting him because of two reasons - he is black and he gives rousing speaches. Surely we are not that stupid...
I cannot believe the supposed Christian leaders that appear to be endorsing this guy. He calls these three specifically good friends. Rick Warren (I think he is getting influcened by new age thinking any way), TD Jakes (no shocker there as he does not even preach the true Word) and author Tony Campolo (this one was a shocker).
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/faith/ (read the PDF)
I guess it is time we get onn the McCain train and hope he brings along Huckabee or someone with some real values. We have a BIG fight ahead of us. This Obama guy is even beating the Clinton Express and a year ago no one thought that was possible!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)